How Low is Low?

RISKS OF VERY LOW LDL CHOLESEROL LEVEL

By Laura Edith Chavez Salas
Universidad De Durango, Campus Zacatecas, Mexico

Amin H. Karim, MD
Houston Methodist Academic Institute

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) represents a category of lipoprotein particles responsible for the transport of cholesterol and various lipids within the bloodstream. Often referred to as the “bad” cholesterol, it serves vital purposes. LDL particles serve as the primary carriers of cholesterol to peripheral tissues and consist of cholesteryl esters and triglycerides encased in a phospholipid shell, free cholesterol, and a single molecule of apolipoprotein B-100. Increased levels of LDL are directly associated with the onset of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), as LDL particles can penetrate the arterial wall, become retained and altered (for instance, oxidized), and facilitate the development of foam cells and atherosclerotic plaques. (1-4)

LDL exhibits heterogeneity, with subclasses that vary in size and density; smaller, denser LDL particles are deemed more atherogenic compared to their larger, more buoyant counterparts. (3, 5, 6) The cholesterol content within LDL particles is quantified as LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), which serves as a conventional marker for evaluating and managing cardiovascular risk. (7) Nevertheless, the quantity of LDL particles (LDL-P) and the concentration of apolipoprotein B (apoB) may offer further risk stratification, particularly in individuals with metabolic syndrome or diabetes, as discrepancies between LDL-C and LDL-P can arise. (8) Evaluation of ASCVD risk can be evaluated by assessing both LDL-C and LDL-P, asserting that the reduction of LDL—primarily through the use of statins and other lipid-lowering treatments—leads to a decrease in cardiovascular events. (4)

DANGERS OF VERY LOW LDL

However, an LDL-lowering regimen can lead to ultra-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. These are typically defined as <40–50 mg/dL, and especially <30 mg/dL. These levels are generally well tolerated and associated with a reduced risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), but several potential dangers have been identified. (9) Mechanistically, very low LDL-C may impair endothelial integrity and platelet function. This could potentially increase bleeding risk, especially for intracranial and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. (10, 11)

The most observed danger of ultra-low LDL is a possible hemorrhagic stroke and other bleeding events, particularly at LDL-C levels below 40 mg/dL, as supported by mechanistic and clinical data. Observational studies and meta-analyses have also reported a U-shaped relationship between LDL-C and all-cause mortality, with both very low (<50 mg/dL) and high (≥130 mg/dL) LDL-C levels associated with increased mortality in certain populations, such as those with coronary artery disease. (15)

There is also some evidence suggesting a potential association between ultra-low LDL-C and increased risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus, particularly with statin therapy. Leading to more complications, there is a possible link to cataract formation and glaucoma, though causality remains unproven and the absolute risk is low. (11, 14)

The main dangers of ultra-low LDL-C are a possible increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke, new-onset diabetes, and, less consistently, all-cause mortality in specific populations. However, for most high-risk patients, the cardiovascular benefits of aggressive LDL-C lowering outweigh these potential risks. (9-14)

HIGH-RISK PATIENTS

Patients at highest risk for complications associated with very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are:

• Individuals with a prior history of hemorrhagic stroke:

The American Stroke Association notes that the risk of hemorrhagic stroke with statin therapy is small and nonsignificant in those without prior cerebrovascular disease, but patients with a history of hemorrhagic stroke may be at increased risk, and lipid lowering in this group requires individualized consideration and further study. (16)

• Patients with poorly controlled hypertension and very low LDL-C:

There is literature that indicates that the combination of very low LDL-C (especially ≤40 mg/dL) and uncontrolled hypertension substantially increases the risk of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Although this risk is particularly more prevalent in East Asian populations, it is relevant globally. (17)

• Women with LDL-C <70 mg/dL:

There is evidence from long-term cohort studies in women that has shown that LDL-C <70 mg/dL is associated with a more than twofold increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke compared to LDL-C 100–129.9 mg/dL, independent of other risk factors. Meaning that women with no other risk factors have more risk than males with no other risk factors. (18)

• Patients on intensive statin therapy or with other risk factors for diabetes: Statin therapy, especially at high intensity, is associated with a modestly increased risk of new-onset diabetes. Particularly in those with predisposing factors such as metabolic syndrome or impaired fasting glucose. (11)

Risks associated with having ultra-low LDL-C are more prevalent in populations most at risk, which are those with prior hemorrhagic stroke, poorly controlled hypertension, women, and individuals with multiple vascular risk factors or on intensive lipid-lowering therapy. 

REFERENCES

  1. Orlova, E V et al. “Three-dimensional structure of low density lipoproteins by electron cryomicroscopy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America vol. 96,15 (1999): 8420-5. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.15.8420
  2. Rhainds, D, and L Brissette. “Low density lipoprotein uptake: holoparticle and cholesteryl ester selective uptake.” The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology vol. 31,9 (1999): 915-31. doi:10.1016/s1357-2725(99)00046-1
  3. Qiao, Ya-Nan et al. “Low-density lipoprotein particles in atherosclerosis.” Frontiers in physiology vol. 13 931931. 30 Aug. 2022, doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.931931
  4. Maurya, Rupesh et al. “Low density lipoprotein receptor endocytosis in cardiovascular disease and the factors affecting LDL levels.” Progress in molecular biology and translational science vol. 194 (2023): 333-345. doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2022.09.010
  5. Ivanova, Ekaterina A et al. “Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein as Biomarker for Atherosclerotic Diseases.” Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity vol. 2017 (2017): 1273042. doi:10.1155/2017/1273042
  6. Packard, C et al. “The role of small, dense low density lipoprotein (LDL): a new look.” International journal of cardiology vol. 74 Suppl 1 (2000): S17-22. doi:10.1016/s0167-5273(99)00107-2
  7. Jialal, I, and A T Remaley. “Measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in assessment and management of cardiovascular disease risk.” Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics vol. 96,1 (2014): 20-2. doi:10.1038/clpt.2014.69
  8. Galimberti, Federica et al. “Apolipoprotein B compared with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases risk assessment.” Pharmacological research vol. 195 (2023): 106873. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106873
  9. Karagiannis, Angelos D et al. “How low is safe? The frontier of very low (<30 mg/dL) LDL cholesterol.” European heart journal vol. 42,22 (2021): 2154-2169. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1080
  10. Siniscalchi, Carmine et al. “Low LDL-Cholesterol and Hemorrhagic Risk: Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Perspectives.” International journal of molecular sciences vol. 26,12 5612. 11 Jun. 2025, doi:10.3390/ijms26125612
  11. Cure, Erkan, and Medine Cumhur Cure. “Emerging risks of lipid-lowering therapy and low LDL levels: implications for eye, brain, and new-onset diabetes.” Lipids in health and disease vol. 24,1 185. 21 May. 2025, doi:10.1186/s12944-025-02606-6
  12. Olsson, A G et al. “Can LDL cholesterol be too low? Possible risks of extremely low levels.” Journal of internal medicine vol. 281,6 (2017): 534-553. doi:10.1111/joim.12614
  13. Rong, Shuang et al. “Association of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels with More than 20-Year Risk of Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality in the General Population.” Journal of the American Heart Association vol. 11,15 (2022): e023690. doi:10.1161/JAHA.121.023690
  14. Faselis, Charles et al. “Is very low LDL-C harmful?.” Current pharmaceutical design vol. 24,31 (2018): 3658-3664. doi:10.2174/1381612824666181008110643
  15. Scudeler, Thiago Luis et al. “Association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease: a real-world analysis using data from an international network.” Scientific reports vol. 14,1 29201. 25 Nov. 2024, doi:10.1038/s41598-024-80578-w
  16. Goldstein, Larry B., et al. “Aggressive LDL-C Lowering and the Brain: Impact on Risk for Dementia and Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.” Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, vol. 43, no. 10, Sept. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1161/atv.0000000000000164.
  17. Wu, Zhijun et al. “The risk of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke in Chinese adults with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations < 70 mg/dL.” BMC medicine vol. 19,1 142. 16 Jun. 2021, doi:10.1186/s12916-021-02014-4
  18. Rist, Pamela M et al. “Lipid levels and the risk of hemorrhagic stroke among women.” Neurology vol. 92,19 (2019): e2286-e2294. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007454

Jailed Semi-Inflated Kissing Balloon Technique

By Dr. Naeem Tahirkheli
Oklahoma, USA


Talking JSKBT ( jailed semi inflated kissing balloon technique ) We did multiple JSKBTs here. Zameer our Pakistani fellow made these images.

Patient had CP/ NSTEMI in a decent sized town 100 miles away. Which has good sized hospital and interventional cardiologist’s and PCIs / primary etc are done. No CABG onsite. Cardiologist did angio for intervention purposes. Saw the anatomy
Calcified distal left main, Ostial/ prox / mid LAD, 90% tight ramus, 90% bifurcation LCX/OM1 and CTO RCA. EF 30% with severe MR ( so even poorer forward flow / and overestimation of the LV function due to MR).

Referred to our surgeon. He said he can ! But very high risk. ( calcified aorta not. Great candidate to put on heart lung bypass / previous EVAR, Poor LV function, ) so referred to one of our colleagues – who said very high risk PCI. Referred back to surgery. Nothing happened. Meanwhile patient having symptoms. So the primary interventional cardiologist from the other city called us.
Was going to need 3 to 4 wires with multiple balloons at a time. So needed an 8 French guide so did do single access Impella. Also deliberately took a short JL 3.5 guide ( which obviously has low support ) so we can sit outside this shortish left main and work

LAD was quite retroflex so you can appreciate flipping of hydrophilic coated wire with >120 bend with microcatheter assistance. Later changed to wiggle wire; So onwards LAD was started. Calcified, retroflex and quite some tortuous so IVUS was done after first run of 2.5 pre-dil;
Still there was IVUS malfunction in mid autorun so predilated with 3.0 balloon and ReIVUS
Heavy more than 270 degrees calcium is there;
Further vessel preparation was done with 3.0 IVL all the way upto LMS

This is tight LCX and tight OM1. Kissing balloon inflations and then stent in LCX and JSKBT is OM. Notice 4 wires in there. Pretty good result. OM Latium looks really good. IVUD of LCX stent good. Did POT of the proximal LCX with NC balloon; This is the long 3.0 x 48 synergy xl. Extending from mid LAD to left main and have 3.0 x 15 balloons as JSKBTs in Intermediate and LCX

Couldn’t get the IVUS to distal edge to see if it is dissection or spasm. These new Hi Def boston IVUS shafts are flimsy and you push them and they get bent. Used three different catheters during this long intervention. Cuz it would get stuck in calcium and then either stop working or the shaft get bent. So images look like distal edge dissection. Placed a 2.5 mm shirt stent. Looked good after wards

IVUS from LAD stent back to left main. Had also done a 4.5 x 6 mm short NC balloon POT for left main. ( size mismatch between left main and LAD)

Of course without Impella. Wouldn’t have been able to do these. With occluded RCA and EF 30% with severe MR. I was getting flat line pressures with IVL and Thenleft main stenting with JSKBTs


The End